|
|
1,000-2,000 TONS DU Spread Over Iraq's Cities From Leuren Moret 4-30-3
Here is the estimate of the tons of DU the US used in Iraq: 1000-2000 tons - more than three times the amount used in
the first Gulf War...only this time it was primarily spread in Iraq's cities, not on the battlefield.
The uranium and its radioactive decay products will remain toxic for over 4 billion years...and will
slowly destroy the genetic future of the Iraqi people.
But the death and destruction will not be contained within the borders of Iraq. Winds will spread it throughout
the Middle East and beyond. The US has carried out its omnicidal plan now on Afghanistan and Iraq...what country is
next?
Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, Kuwait, the Gulf States, and Iran will breathe the invisible war too... and
they will share the fate of the Iraqi people, the caretakers of the cradle of civilization.
Uranium Cancer Check For Returning UK Troops
By Paul Brown The Guardian Weekly
Soldiers returning from the Gulf will be offered tests on the levels of
depleted uranium in their bodies to check if they are in danger of kidney damage and lung cancer as a result of exposure,
the Ministry of Defence said this week.The ministry was responding to a warning from the Royal Society, Britain's
top scientific body, that soldiers and civilians might be exposed to toxic levels. It challenged assurances from the Defence
Secretary, Geoff Hoon, that depleted uranium was not a risk. A ministry spokeswoman said that if soldiers followed
instructions correctly and wore respirators in areas where depleted uranium might have been used they would not suffer
dangerous exposure, but all would be offered urine tests. The overall results would be published. The ministry said it
would also publish details of where and how much depleted uranium was used. Brian Spratt, chairman of the society's
working group on depleted uranium, said: "It is highly unsatisfactory to deploy a large amount of a material that is weakly
radioactive and chemically toxic without knowing how much soldiers and civilians have been exposed to it . . . It
is vital that this monitoring takes place within a matter of months." Experts have calculated that between 1,000 and
2,000 tonnes of depleted uranium were used by the coalition in the Iraq campaign.
The Guardian Weekly 20-3-0501, page 4
|
|
THE SUNDAY HERALD (SCOTLAND)
30 March 2003 US forces' use of depleted uranium weapons is 'illegal' By Neil
Mackay, Investigations Editor
BRITISH and American coalition forces are using depleted uranium (DU) shells in the war against Iraq and deliberately
flouting a United Nations resolution which classifies the munitions as illegal weapons of mass destruction.
DU
contaminates land, causes ill-health and cancers among the soldiers using the weapons, the armies they target and civilians, leading
to birth defects in children.
Professor Doug Rokke, ex-director of the Pentagon's depleted uranium project -- a
former professor of environmental science at Jacksonville University and onetime US army colonel who was tasked by the
US department of defence with the post-first Gulf war depleted uranium desert clean-up -- said use of DU was a 'war crime'.
Rokke
said: 'There is a moral point to be made here. This war was about Iraq possessing illegal weapons of mass destruction --
yet we are using weapons of mass destruction ourselves.' He added: 'Such double-standards are repellent.'
The
latest use of DU in the current conflict came on Friday when an American A10 tankbuster plane fired a DU shell, killing
one British soldier and injuring three others in a 'friendly fire' incident.
According to a August 2002 report by the UN subcommission, laws which are breached by the use of DU shells include:
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; the Charter of the United Nations; the Genocide Convention; the Convention
Against Torture; the four Geneva Conventions of 1949; the Conventional Weapons Convention of 1980; nd the Hague Conventions
of 1899 and 1907, which expressly forbid employing> 'poison or poisoned weapons' and 'arms, projectiles or materials
calculated to cause unnecessary suffering'. All of these laws are designed to spare civilians from unwarranted suffering
in armed conflicts.
DU has been blamed for the effects of Gulf war syndrome -- typified by chronic muscle
and joint pain, fatigue and memory loss -- among 200,000 US soldiers after the 1991 conflict.
It is also cited
as the most likely cause of the 'increased number of birth deformities and cancer in Iraq' following the first Gulf war.
'Cancer
appears to have increased between seven and 10 times and deformities between four and six times,' according to the UN subcommission.
The
Pentagon has admitted that 320 metric tons of DU were left on the battlefield after the first Gulf war, although Russian
military experts say 1000 metric tons is a more accurate figure.
In 1991, the Allies fired 944,000 DU rounds or
some 2700 tons of DU tipped bombs. A UK Atomic Energy Authority report said that some 500,000 people would die
before the end of this century, due to radioactive debris left in the desert.
The use of DU has also led to birth
defects in the children of Allied veterans and is believed to be the cause of the 'worrying number of anophthalmos
cases -- babies born without eyes' in Iraq. Only one in 50 million births should be anophthalmic, yet one Baghdad hospital
had eight cases in just two years. Seven of the fathers had been exposed to American DU anti-tank rounds in
1991. There have also been cases of Iraqi babies born without the crowns of their skulls, a deformity also
linked to DU shelling.
A study of Gulf war veterans showed that 67% had children with severe illnesses, missing
eyes, blood infections, respiratory problems and fused fingers.
Rokke told the Sunday Herald: 'A nation's military
personnel cannot wilfully contaminate any other nation, cause harm to persons and the environment and then
ignore the consequences of their actions.
'To do so is a crime against humanity.
'We must do what is right for
the citizens of the world -- ban DU.'
He called on the US and UK to 'recognise the immoral consequences
of their actions and assume responsibility for medical care and thorough environmental remediation'.
He added:
'We can't just use munitions which leave a toxic wasteland behind them and kill indiscriminately.
'It is equivalent
to a war crime.'
Rokke said that coalition troops were currently fighting in the Gulf without adequate respiratory
protection against DU contamination.
The Sunday Herald has previously revealed how the Ministry of Defence had test-fired
some 6350 DU rounds into the Solway Firth over more than a decade, from 1989 to 1999.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|